
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.389320
handle: 10419/85805
In models of sequential decision making herd behaviour occurs if the signals smart (dumb) agents receive are (un)correlated and if agents have reputational concerns. We show that introducing costly effort to become informed about project payoffs (i) eliminates herd behaviour and (ii) shifts attention from the incentives for agent 2 to herd to agent 1 to exert effort. While the first agent anticipates the second agent's behaviour, his influence is only partial. The unique equilibrium either implies delegation to the first agent; to the second agent; or has both agents participating.
ddc:330, EUR ESE 02, D82, herd behaviour, Asymmetrische Information, D72, Reputation; herd behaviour; information collection., Informationsverhalten, Entscheidungstheorie, information collection., Theorie, Reputation, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D72
ddc:330, EUR ESE 02, D82, herd behaviour, Asymmetrische Information, D72, Reputation; herd behaviour; information collection., Informationsverhalten, Entscheidungstheorie, information collection., Theorie, Reputation, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D72
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
