
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3839968 , 10.2139/ssrn.3857657 , 10.1007/s41471-021-00114-8 , 10.2139/ssrn.3889531 , 10.13140/rg.2.2.20417.48488
pmid: 34764538
pmc: PMC8422065
handle: 10419/235716 , 10419/286445
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3839968 , 10.2139/ssrn.3857657 , 10.1007/s41471-021-00114-8 , 10.2139/ssrn.3889531 , 10.13140/rg.2.2.20417.48488
pmid: 34764538
pmc: PMC8422065
handle: 10419/235716 , 10419/286445
AbstractThe pace of the global decarbonization process is widely believed to hinge on the rate of cost improvements for clean energy technologies, in particular renewable power and energy storage. This paper adopts the classical learning-by-doing framework of Wright (1936), which predicts that cost will fall as a function of the cumulative volume of past deployments. We first examine the learning curves for solar photovoltaic modules, wind turbines and electrolyzers. These estimates then become the basis for estimating the dynamics of the life-cycle cost of generating the corresponding clean energy, i.e., electricity from solar and wind power as well as hydrogen. Our calculations point to significant and sustained learning curves, which, in some contexts, predict a much more rapid cost decline than suggested by the traditional 80% learning curve. Finally, we argue that the observed learning curves for individual clean energy technologies reinforce each other in advancing the transition to a decarbonized energy economy.
Renewable energy, Energy storage, 330, Levelized cost of energy, ddc:330, energy storage, ddc:650, 333.7, Review Article, renewable energy, Electrolysis, Learning-by-doing, learning-by-doing, electrolysis, levelized cost of energy
Renewable energy, Energy storage, 330, Levelized cost of energy, ddc:330, energy storage, ddc:650, 333.7, Review Article, renewable energy, Electrolysis, Learning-by-doing, learning-by-doing, electrolysis, levelized cost of energy
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
