Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Technical monitoring considerations for advancing CCS Projects under the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard in relation to other global regulatory regimes

Authors: Katherine Romanak; Tim Dixon;

Technical monitoring considerations for advancing CCS Projects under the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard in relation to other global regulatory regimes

Abstract

The California Air Resources Board Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) seeks to reduce GHG emissions associated with transport fuels used in California, including those produced outside the state and imported for use. The LCFS recognises emissions reductions through carbon capture, utilisation and geologic storage (CCUS) and enables these to generate LCFS credits provided that regulatory requirements and guidelines set forth within the LCFS CCS Protocol (CCSP) are met. These guidelines are focused on demonstration of “permanent storage” and environmental integrity which includes the entire storage complex but predominantly focuses in the near-surface and surface. Our analysis of the CCSP indicates several technical challenges with the regulation as written including 1) the requirement of prescriptive monitoring technologies, 2) a non-negotiable 100-year post injection site care period (PISC), 3) the need for meaningful data collection before a project can be certified, and 4) the expectation that environmental variations over the 100+ monitoring period can be predicted from a year of environmental baseline data. We discuss the technical ramifications of these requirements and discuss the ways in which common and low-cost near surface monitoring techniques can best be used to satisfy the requirements in light of new learning in environmental monitoring.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!