
AbstractCross‐country studies reveal two consistent gender gaps in education—underachievement in school by boys and low rates of participation in STEM studies by girls. Recent economics research has shown the importance of social influences on women's STEM avoidance, but male low achievement has been less‐studied and tends to be attributed to behavior problems and deficient non‐cognitive skills. I revisit the determinants of the gender gap in U.S. educational attainment with a relatively‐advantaged sample of young men and women and find that school behavior and measured skills are not very important drivers of gender differences, particularly in the transition to college. Educational aspirations, on the other hand, are strongly predictive of educational gaps and the gender difference in aspirations cannot be explained, even with rich adolescent data that includes parental expectations and school achievement indicators. These results suggest that gender identity concerns may influence (and damage) the educational prospects of boys as well as girls through norms of masculinity that discourage academic achievement.
Economics, Applied economics, Basic Behavioral and Social Science, Education, Economic theory, aspirations, Behavioral and Social Science, gender, Econometrics, gender identity, Economic Theory, Pediatric, education, J16, ddc:330, school achievement, J12, college graduation, Gender Equality, Quality Education, Applied Economics, I20
Economics, Applied economics, Basic Behavioral and Social Science, Education, Economic theory, aspirations, Behavioral and Social Science, gender, Econometrics, gender identity, Economic Theory, Pediatric, education, J16, ddc:330, school achievement, J12, college graduation, Gender Equality, Quality Education, Applied Economics, I20
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
