Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Breaking the Barrier – On the Use of Joint Audits in the Internal Audit Profession

Authors: Joel Behrend; Marc Eulerich;

Breaking the Barrier – On the Use of Joint Audits in the Internal Audit Profession

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the growing relevance of internal auditing, academics and practitioners emphasize the importance of an adequate and adaptable staffing approach. Because internal audit resources are considered a crucial component of internal audit quality, we investigate why internal auditors perform audits with experts from within or outside the organization. These joint audits augment resources and represent a viable alternative to additional staffing or full outsourcing of the internal audit function (IAF). Using survey data from three national chapters of the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), we consider three IAF dimensions (i.e., structure and resources, activities and processes, environmental factors) associated with resource augmentations. Our findings provide evidence that joint audits are used when the IAF is comparatively small and competent, when the IAF focuses on risk and strategy-related tasks, and when the IAF is decentralized. Our findings also suggest that joint audits can strengthen the auditor-auditee relationship. Data Availability: Please contact the authors. JEL Classifications: M42; M49.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Wirtschaftswissenschaften

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!