
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3137753
We investigate the impact on strategic alliance value when auditors have greater knowledge and experience in auditing contractual alliances. Although common and economically significant, contractual alliances often fail due to uncertainty, lack of trust, and poor culture matches between alliance partners. We hypothesize that auditors with more extensive alliance expertise can help partner firms reduce information uncertainty and hold-up problems endemic in alliance relationships, resulting in higher quality alliances. Our measures of auditor expertise capture three aspects of auditor knowledge, including general alliance, alliance type (e.g. technology alliances), and deal-specific (both alliance partners share the same auditor) expertise. Primary findings document that announcement date abnormal returns are higher among alliance partners served by an alliance expert auditor, after controlling for Big N and auditor industry expertise. Effects are more pronounced among alliance partners where uncertainty and trust are more problematic – when bankruptcy risk is greater, boards are not independent, managers are more entrenched, and corporate culture environments are of poor quality. Overall, our evidence suggests that auditors with alliance expertise help firms increase value in strategic alliance arrangements.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
