
Abstract This article starts from the assumption that the future Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) will be shaped by a new and different type of international investment adjudicator (IIA) and focuses on the diversity issues that will need to be addressed during the Court’s creation. In this article, diversity is understood in a broad sense that includes questions related to IIA gender, race, geographical origins and legal background. The article argues that diversity may in fact evolve into one of the MIC’s key collective composition rules. It also sets out some of the grounds in favour of diversity in the MIC, and considers the specific ways in which diversity may permeate the constituent process for the MIC roster and its subsequent modus operandi. A further common thread is provided by the links between diversity and the principle of independence and impartiality, which will be a crucial MIC duty.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
