
handle: 10419/222661
Using a Bewley‐Hugget‐Aiyagari model we show how to use the Fokker‐Planck equation for likelihood inference in heterogeneous agent (HA) models. We study the finite sample properties of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) in Monte Carlo experiments using cross‐sectional data on wealth and income. We use the Kullback–Leibler divergence to investigate identification problems that may affect inference. Unrestricted MLE leads to considerable biases of some parameters. Calibrating weakly identified parameters is shown to be useful to pin down the remaining structural parameters. We illustrate our approach by estimating the model for the US economy using the Survey of Consumer Finances.
Kullback-Leibler divergence, ddc:330, C63, C13, Heterogeneous agent models, E24, C10, Continuous-time, Fokker-Planck equations, E21, Maximum likelihood
Kullback-Leibler divergence, ddc:330, C63, C13, Heterogeneous agent models, E24, C10, Continuous-time, Fokker-Planck equations, E21, Maximum likelihood
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
