The term "genocide" has been commonly used, particularly in political dialogue, to describe atrocities of great diversity, magnitude, and character. Yet the restricted approach towards the adoption of the term imposes an intimidating brake to create an effective response to prevent the crime. Since the Genocide Convention was created in 1948, its effectiveness has been hindered. The double mental element aimed at the destruction of the exhaustive group as the prerequisite element to establish the crime under the Convention is creating an impediment in the way of justice. This prerequisite element requires a new wider approach. With a wider approach towards the definition of genocide, the paper focuses on the General Assembly Resolution 96 (I), which resembles the intention behind the enactment of the Genocide Convention and proposes P3 objectives for the Right to Intervene along with a strategic model for implementing precautionary and preventive approach to hinder future occurrence of genocide and mass atrocities. The purpose of the paper is to focus on precautionary approach and international co-operation for the prevention of genocide.