
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2951451
We find some support for theories predicting that the presence of informed investors adversely affects liquidity: When arrangers retain a share in the loan this impacts negatively liquidity. We find strong evidence that investor diversity is beneficial to liquidity: Loans with larger syndicates; syndicates with higher investor turnover, more investor types, and lower investor-types’ loan share concentration have lower bid-ask spreads. These findings are robust and do not appear to be driven by investors’ borrower/loan selection. We find that not all investors contribute positively to loan liquidity. While an increase in the number of hedge funds in a syndicate lowers the loan’s bid-ask spread, an increase in the number of banks in the syndicate has the opposite effect, consistent with existing beliefs that asset managers are active traders but banks follow buy-and-hold investment strategies.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
