
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2763388
The role that inequality (Stewart, 2008), grievances, social cohesion and the presence of state institutions in relation to ethnicity (Wimmer, 1997; Kronenberg, 2012) play in the emergence of armed conflict is still an open research area. To do so, using ethnicity as a unit of analysis (Brubaker, 2006) might prove useful to bypass the challenges posed by the constructivist or primordialist approaches to the subject.To do so a theoretical model that relates the relationship between the provision of public services, social cohesion, presence of state institutions, economic inequality, political participation and the feasibility of rebellion and the existence of armed conflict is presented.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
