
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.273337
handle: 10419/85764 , 10419/21169
In this paper we evaluate the QALY loss, which may be assigned to the prevalence of specific chronic illnesses and physical handicaps. The analysis is based on an individual self-rating health satisfaction question asked in the British Household Panel Survey data set. This question provides a natural cardinalization of health utility .Our method is a refinement of the method introduced by Cutler and Richardson (1997). We extend their approach in two directions. First, the health utility loss caused by a specific illness is allowed to have a different impact on individuals depending on their age. The empirical analysis shows that there are indeed significant age effects. The second extension deals with the cardinalization procedure chosen by Cutler and Richardson. They implicitly assume a linear effect of underlying explanatory variables on the evaluation of health. Instead, we suggest a more natural cardinalization, which does not exclude non-linearities.
Großbritannien, Chronic Illnesses; Health Satisfaction; QALY loss; Subjective Health, Subjective Health, QALY weight, I10, Gesundheitsökonomik, Lebensqualität, Altersgruppe, ddc:330, I12, Chronic Illnesses, QALY loss, Index, health satisfaction, Chronic diseases, Health Satisfaction, Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse, Krankheit, Lebensalter, Theorie, jel: jel:I10, jel: jel:I12
Großbritannien, Chronic Illnesses; Health Satisfaction; QALY loss; Subjective Health, Subjective Health, QALY weight, I10, Gesundheitsökonomik, Lebensqualität, Altersgruppe, ddc:330, I12, Chronic Illnesses, QALY loss, Index, health satisfaction, Chronic diseases, Health Satisfaction, Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse, Krankheit, Lebensalter, Theorie, jel: jel:I10, jel: jel:I12
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
