
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2672305
To bring apportionment closer to quotas or the apportionment quotient closer to the population quotient, instead of using “distance,” we introduce f-divergence for utilitarianism and Bregman divergence for suitable optimization. Even in our relaxed condition, we find that we must use alpha-divergence for optimization and show that the minimization of alpha-divergence induces the same divisor methods that correspond to the Kolm-Atkinson social welfare function, which is bounded by constant relative risk aversion.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
