
handle: 10419/123116
By how much does an increase in operating effectiveness of a public employment agency (PEA) and a reduction of unemployment benefits reduce unemployment? Using a recent labour market reform in Germany as background, we find that an enhanced effectiveness of the PEA explains about 20% of the observed post-reform unemployment decline. The role of unemployment benefit reduction explains just about 5% of the observed decline. Due to disincentive effects resulting from the reform, the reform of the PEA could have had an even higher impact on unemployment reduction if there had been less focus on long-term unemployed workers.
unemployment, structural model, ddc:330, J65, employment agencies, J68, labour market reform, employment agencies, unemployment benefits, labour market reform, unemployment, structural model, H, unemployment benefits, E24, jel: jel:J65, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J68
unemployment, structural model, ddc:330, J65, employment agencies, J68, labour market reform, employment agencies, unemployment benefits, labour market reform, unemployment, structural model, H, unemployment benefits, E24, jel: jel:J65, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J68
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
