
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2560718
This paper reveals how Green and Porter (1984) have tried to imitate the Nash equilibrium for collusion, and how they have mixed in too many errors. This paper then clarifies the various concepts of duopoly competition, including Cournot, Bertrand, and Stackelberg. Finally, it also clarifies the true meaning of free collusion.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
