
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.254108
handle: 10419/105545
This paper applies the panel unit root test proposed by Im, Pesaran and Shin (1997) to test for unemployment hysteresis in the US states and the EU countries against the alternative of a natural rate. The results show that hysteresis for the EU and the natural rate for the US states are the most plausible hypotheses.
ddc:330, Panelforschung, Hysteresis, Arbeitslosigkeit, Unemployment Hysteresis, Panel Tests, Unit Roots, EU-Staaten, E24, Vergleich, C22, USA, C23
ddc:330, Panelforschung, Hysteresis, Arbeitslosigkeit, Unemployment Hysteresis, Panel Tests, Unit Roots, EU-Staaten, E24, Vergleich, C22, USA, C23
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
