
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2519533
This paper shows that a reduction in tax discrimination between debt and equity funding leads to better capitalized financial institutions. In many countries, the cost of debt is tax-deductible while the remuneration for equity (dividends) is not deductible. Theoretically, this unequal treatment gives a bank - as any other firm - an incentive to take on more debt. This paper exploits exogenous variation in the tax treatment of debt and equity created by the introduction of a tax shield for equity in Belgium. This quasi-natural experiment demonstrates that a more equal treatment of debt and equity significantly increases bank capital ratios, driven by an increase in common equity. Additionally, the results illustrate that both high and low capitalized banks react to the change in tax legislation, but that the latter profit more in terms of overall risk reduction. Overall, the findings confirm that reducing the tax discrimination between debt and equity could be an innovative policy tool for bank regulators.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
