
handle: 10419/102186 , 10900/59941
Abstract This paper investigates the tax responsiveness of multinational firms’ investment decisions in foreign countries, distinguishing firms that are able to avoid taxes (avoiders) from those that are not (non-avoiders). From a theoretical point of view, the tax responsiveness of firms crucially depends on this distinction. Empirically, however, a firm's ability to avoid profit taxes is inherently unobservable to the researcher. To address this problem, we use a finite mixture modeling approach which allows us to distinguish avoiders from non-avoiders stochastically from a mixture of distributions of the two types of firms. Using panel data on the universe of foreign affiliates of German multinational firms over the years 1999–2010, we find that investments of tax avoiders do not respond to host-country profit taxes at all, while those of non-avoiders do. About 11% of the affiliates are estimated to be able to avoid taxes. These investments account for about 58% of the stock of foreign fixed assets held by German multinational firms abroad. A one-percentage-point increase in the statutory corporate profit tax rate of a host country is found to reduce the fixed assets of non-avoiders in that host country by 0.81%.
corporate profit taxation, multinational firms, profit shifting, tax avoidance, tax elasticity, finite-mixture model, firm-level data, 330, ddc:330, multinational firms, tax elasticity, finite-mixture model, profit shifting, firm-level data, tax avoidance, corporate profit taxation, C35, F23, H32, C38, jel: jel:C35, jel: jel:C38, jel: jel:F23, jel: jel:H32
corporate profit taxation, multinational firms, profit shifting, tax avoidance, tax elasticity, finite-mixture model, firm-level data, 330, ddc:330, multinational firms, tax elasticity, finite-mixture model, profit shifting, firm-level data, tax avoidance, corporate profit taxation, C35, F23, H32, C38, jel: jel:C35, jel: jel:C38, jel: jel:F23, jel: jel:H32
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
