Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10016/20439 , 10278/3719977
We show that the commitment to not allocate may be exploited by a seller/social planner to increase the expected social surplus that can be achieved in the sale of an indivisible unit.
efficiency; auctions; mechanism design;, Auctions, Mechanism design, Auctions; Efficiency; Mechanism design, Efficiency, mechanism design, Economía, Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models, D82, efficiency, auctions, D44, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D44
efficiency; auctions; mechanism design;, Auctions, Mechanism design, Auctions; Efficiency; Mechanism design, Efficiency, mechanism design, Economía, Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models, D82, efficiency, auctions, D44, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D44
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts