
We propose a model to reconcile the theory of inter-temporal non-renewable resource depletion with well-known stylized facts concerning the exploitation of exhaustible resources such as oil. Our approach introduces geological constraints into a Hotelling type extraction-exploration model. We show that such constraints, in combination with initially small reserves and strictly convexexploration costs, can coherently explain bell-shaped peaks in natural resource extraction and hence U-shapes in prices. As production increases, marginal profits (marginal revenues less marginal extraction cost) are observed to decline, while as production decreases, marginal profits rise at a positive rate that is not necessarily the rate of discount.A numerical calibration of the model to the world oil market shows that geological constraints have the potential to substantially increase the future oil price. While some (small) non-OPEC producers are found to increase production in response to higher oil prices induced by the geological constraints, most (large) producers’ production declines, leading to a lower peak level for globaloil production.
Hotelling rule, Reserve development, Peak oil; Hotelling rule; Exploration; Reserve development; Geological constraints, Peak oil, Urbanisation, Geology, Global oil production, Geological constraints, Numerical model, Oil production, Numerical calibration, Exploration, Natural resources, jel: jel:C61, jel: jel:Q30, jel: jel:Q47, jel: jel:C7
Hotelling rule, Reserve development, Peak oil; Hotelling rule; Exploration; Reserve development; Geological constraints, Peak oil, Urbanisation, Geology, Global oil production, Geological constraints, Numerical model, Oil production, Numerical calibration, Exploration, Natural resources, jel: jel:C61, jel: jel:Q30, jel: jel:Q47, jel: jel:C7
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
