
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2428382
We analyze the empirical pattern of the Ohlson models (1995) focusing on four basic implicit assumptions that support the model: (i) the displacement property, (ii) the goodness of book value as a proxy of the ability of assets and liabilities to generate cash flows, (iii) the conservatism correction value, and (iv) the clean surplus relation. We test the long-term equilibrium relations on the Dow Jones Composite Index companies, using an Error Correction Model when non-stationary variables are present and a cointegration relation exists. The results show that for only slightly more than 10% of the companies we cannot simultaneously reject the four assumptions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
