
handle: 10419/98874
This paper offers a new theory of discrimination in the workplace. We consider a manager who has to assign two tasks to two employees. The manager has superior information about the employees' abilities. We show that besides an equilibrium where the manager does not discriminate, equilibria exist where the manager discriminates in favor of the employee whom the employees expect to be favored. The manager, who has no taste for discrimination, discriminates in order to avoid demotivating the “favorite.” We show that the nondiscriminatory equilibrium is unstable. Yet the manager would prefer to commit not to discriminate. (JEL D82, D84, J71, M12, M51, M54)
Bayesian games, ddc:330, M51, M54, D82, confidence management, discrimination, confidence management, Bayesian games, J71, discrimination, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:J71, jel: jel:M51, jel: jel:M54
Bayesian games, ddc:330, M51, M54, D82, confidence management, discrimination, confidence management, Bayesian games, J71, discrimination, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:J71, jel: jel:M51, jel: jel:M54
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
