
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2383143
handle: 11250/2495985 , 10419/210050 , 1814/39595
A mismatch between the time scale of a structural VAR (SVAR) model and that of the time series data used for its estimation can have serious consequences for identification, estimation and interpretation of the impulse response functions. However, the use of mixed frequency data, combined with a proper estimation approach, can alleviate the temporal aggregation bias, mitigate the identification issues, and yield more reliable responses to shocks. The problems and possible remedy are illustrated analytically and with both simulated and actual data.
mixed frequency data, VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212, estimation, ddc:330, JEL: E32, JEL: C32, JEL: C43, temporal aggregation, identification, structural VAR, impulse response function, C32, C43, E32
mixed frequency data, VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212, estimation, ddc:330, JEL: E32, JEL: C32, JEL: C43, temporal aggregation, identification, structural VAR, impulse response function, C32, C43, E32
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
