
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2345972
We examine the efficiency of a GJR-GARCH model where the residuals follow the standardize Pearson type-IV distribution. As a case study we consider the historical daily close price of the Standard and Poor’s index. The model is tested with a variety of loss functions and the efficiency is examined by application of several Value-at-Risk tests and measures. The results indicate that the Pearson type IV distribution performs better than the skewed t-Student especially at the high confidence levels.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
