
Financial innovations that change how promises are collateralized affect prices and investment, even in the absence of any change in fundamentals. In C-models, the ability to leverage an asset always generates overinvestment compared to Arrow-Debreu. Credit Default Swaps always leads to underinvestment with respect to Arrow-Debreu, and in some cases even robustly destroy competitive equilibrium. The need for collateral would seem to cause under-investment. Our analysis illustrates a countervailing force: goods that serve as collateral yield additional services and can therefore be over-valued and over-produced. In models without cash flow problems there is never marginal underinvestment on collateral. (JEL D52, D86, D92, E44, G01, G12, R31)
Financial innovation, Collateral capacity, Investment, Leverage, Naked CDS, Collateral equilibrium, Non-existence, Financial innovation, Collateral, Investment, Repayment enforceability problems, Cash flow problems, Leverage, CDS, Non-existence, Marginal efficiency, Financial Innovation, Collateral Capacity, Investment, Leverage, Naked CDS, Collateral Equilibrium, Non-Existence, jel: jel:D52, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:D53, jel: jel:G01, jel: jel:G12, jel: jel:G10, jel: jel:G11
Financial innovation, Collateral capacity, Investment, Leverage, Naked CDS, Collateral equilibrium, Non-existence, Financial innovation, Collateral, Investment, Repayment enforceability problems, Cash flow problems, Leverage, CDS, Non-existence, Marginal efficiency, Financial Innovation, Collateral Capacity, Investment, Leverage, Naked CDS, Collateral Equilibrium, Non-Existence, jel: jel:D52, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:D53, jel: jel:G01, jel: jel:G12, jel: jel:G10, jel: jel:G11
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
