
This paper reports the results from a controlled field experiment designed to investigate the causal effect of unannounced, public recognition on employee performance. We hired more than 300 employees to work on a three-hour data-entry task. In a random sample of work groups, workers unexpectedly received recognition after two hours of work. We find that recognition increases subsequent performance substantially, and particularly when recognition is exclusively provided to the best performers. Remarkably, workers who did not receive recognition are mainly responsible for this performance increase. Our results are consistent with workers having a preference for conformity and being reciprocal at the same time. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2291 . This paper was accepted by John List, behavioral economics.
INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, Vertrauen, Test, ORGANIZATIONS, 330, INFORMATION, C93, Leistungsmotivation, GIFT-EXCHANGE, reciprocity, Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitut, AWARDS, Employee motivation, INCENTIVE SCHEMES, Employee motivation, recognition, reciprocity, conformity, field experiment, Deutschland, conformity, WORK, Austauschtheorie (Soziologie), ddc:330, M52, SOCIAL NORMS, employee motivation, RECIPROCITY, employee motivation, recognition, reciprocity, conformity, field experiment, field experiment, employee motivation,recognition,reciprocity,conformity,field experiment, WORKPLACE, recognition, jel: jel:C93, jel: jel:M52
INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, Vertrauen, Test, ORGANIZATIONS, 330, INFORMATION, C93, Leistungsmotivation, GIFT-EXCHANGE, reciprocity, Wirtschaftsforschungsinstitut, AWARDS, Employee motivation, INCENTIVE SCHEMES, Employee motivation, recognition, reciprocity, conformity, field experiment, Deutschland, conformity, WORK, Austauschtheorie (Soziologie), ddc:330, M52, SOCIAL NORMS, employee motivation, RECIPROCITY, employee motivation, recognition, reciprocity, conformity, field experiment, field experiment, employee motivation,recognition,reciprocity,conformity,field experiment, WORKPLACE, recognition, jel: jel:C93, jel: jel:M52
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 211 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
