
handle: 10419/67519
We introduce archetypal analysis as a tool to describe and categorize scientists. This approach identifies typical characteristics of extreme ('archetypal') values in a multivariate data set. These positive or negative contextual attributes can be allocated to each scientists under investigation. In our application, we use a sample of seven bibliometric indicators for 29,083 economists obtained from the RePEc database and identify six archetypes. These are mainly characterized by ratios of published work and citations. We discuss applications and limitations of this approach. Finally, we assign relative shares of the identified archetypes to each economist in our sample.
ddc:330, Welt, Extremwerttheorie, scientists, Bibliometrie, RePEc, classification, Ökonomen, archetypal analysis, classification, scientists, RePEc, archetypal analysis, A12, A14, Schätzung, jel: jel:A14, jel: jel:A12
ddc:330, Welt, Extremwerttheorie, scientists, Bibliometrie, RePEc, classification, Ökonomen, archetypal analysis, classification, scientists, RePEc, archetypal analysis, A12, A14, Schätzung, jel: jel:A14, jel: jel:A12
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
