Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Replacement of Coal by Fracgas in the Production of Electric Power - Yale Graduates in Energy

Authors: Robert M. Ames; Anthony Corridore; Edward Hirs; Paul W. MacAvoy;

Replacement of Coal by Fracgas in the Production of Electric Power - Yale Graduates in Energy

Abstract

New well drilling technologies, when utilized to fracture common shale formations promise to provide access to very large volumes of gas. Indeed, the trade press and news media have generally taken the position that “fracgas” over the next decade can add up to 800 trillion cubic feet of reserves, four times the current level of reserves, almost equally spaced over the four quadrants of the country. But estimates of reserves are notably judgmental and with respect to new finds can be over optimistic. The key issue however is not the size of the far future reserve base, but rather if fracgas production can replace coal in electricity generation in the next few years as limits on coal sulfur and carbon oxide emissions are phased into coal plant operations. Fracgas per KWH of produced electricity has an emissions rate one quarter that of coal. Then is it going to be used in gas engines to replace shutdown coal boilers to the extent required to sustain growing electricity supply? The answer does not lie in detailed and controversial reserve estimates. Alternatively, there are two sources of data now extent that are relevant, (1) the estimated marker price of natural and fracgas (and its relation to futures prices) and (2) the volumes of coal in power production. We use a range of values in these data series to estimate the cross elasticity of coal demand with respect to gas price, that is the percent change in coal in power production with respect to the percent change in gas price. As a result also of reviewing a number of recent such estimates, as well as our own, we conclude that there is a determined limit on coal to gas substitution far short of driving coal out of the power market.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!