
arXiv: 1104.3318
In order to calculate the unobserved volatility in conditional heteroscedastic time series models, the natural recursive approximation is very often used. Following \cite{StraumannMikosch2006}, we will call the model \emph{invertible} if this approximation (based on true parameter vector) converges to the real volatility. Our main results are necessary and sufficient conditions for invertibility. We will show that the stationary GARCH($p$, $q$) model is always invertible, but certain types of models, such as EGARCH of \cite{Nelson1991} and VGARCH of \cite{EngleNg1993} may indeed be non-invertible. Moreover, we will demonstrate it's possible for the pair (true volatility, approximation) to have a non-degenerate stationary distribution. In such cases, the volatility estimate given by the recursive approximation with the true parameter vector is inconsistent.
34 pages, 3 figures
FOS: Mathematics, 62M10, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Statistics Theory (math.ST)
FOS: Mathematics, 62M10, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Statistics Theory (math.ST)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
