Conservative women are increasing their presence in politics – whether as elected representatives or organized as women’s groups in civil society- and women’s role in the public and private sphere is often a core theme of centre-right parties and policies. Nevertheless, rightist women and the role of centre-right parties are blind spots in the research on women and representation. Overviews of women’s presence in parliaments, for instance, rarely segregate by party affiliation and research on the substantive representation of women - what difference women representatives make ‘for women’ - tend to focus women’s issues that are traditionally associated with women (such as child-caring and the family), or those with a ‘feminist accent’ (such as abortion or domestic violence) – with feminism being interpreted sui generis on the left of the political spectrum. We contend that such an exclusive focus on leftist-feminist actors and policies creates bias in our empirical research, but also, and furthermore, limits our theoretical understanding of representation and of what constitutes ‘good’, democratic representation. Increasingly, we are seeing conservative representatives claiming to act for women. Feminists, to be sure, might well recoil from the idea of conservative women like Margaret Thatcher or Sarah Palin as representatives of women. But, pre-emptively dismissing conservative acts and claims of acting for women on the grounds that this is either false consciousness or that these women are but ‘a wolf in sheep’s clothing’ (where claims and acts that unintentionally or intentionally harm women’s interests are disguised as claims in favor of women) cannot lead to good conceptual or empirical research. It is our contention that it cannot only be left-feminist substantive representation that makes for ‘good’ women’s substantive representation (even if this is what feminist scholars might desire). Given that ‘women’ are not a homogeneous but heterogeneous group – and because progressive feminism simply does not speak for, or to, all women – good representation is enhanced by the ‘the making present of’ complementary, competing and conflicting views on what women, and their interest and needs are. Accordingly, gender and politics scholars should both admit to the presence of conservative’s representatives in our parliaments (and elsewhere, for that matter) and investigate their role in the substantive representation of women. To do that requires that our analytic frameworks and research designs are capable of including conservative women and their representative claims in our analyses. The main goal of the paper is to establish such a framework for conducting comparative research on the role of rightist parties (conservatives and Christian-democrats) in gendered representation, and apply them to recent U.K. and Belgian processes of the substantive representation of women in which Conservatives and Christian-democrats were involved.