
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1906195
handle: 10419/51684 , 10419/73482
Team success relies on assigning team members to the right tasks. We use controlled experiments to study how roles are assigned within teams and how this affects team performance. Subjects play the takeover game in pairs consisting of a buyer and a seller. Understanding optimal play is very demanding for buyers and trivial for sellers. Teams perform better when roles are assigned endogenously or teammates are allowed to chat about their decisions, but the interaction effect between endogenous role assignment and chat unexpectedly worsens team performance. We argue that ego depletion provides a likely explanation for this surprising result.
Role selection in teams, team performance, takeover game, winner’s curse, communication, experiment, winner s curse, Test, Spieltheorie, experiment, Anforderungsprofil, ddc:330, communication, Role selection in teams, takeover game, Arbeitsgruppe, Arbeitsleistung, winner's curse, C91, C92, role selection in teams, role selection in teams, team performance, takeover game, winner's curse, communication, experiment, team performance, Soziale Rolle, jel: jel:C92, jel: jel:C91
Role selection in teams, team performance, takeover game, winner’s curse, communication, experiment, winner s curse, Test, Spieltheorie, experiment, Anforderungsprofil, ddc:330, communication, Role selection in teams, takeover game, Arbeitsgruppe, Arbeitsleistung, winner's curse, C91, C92, role selection in teams, role selection in teams, team performance, takeover game, winner's curse, communication, experiment, team performance, Soziale Rolle, jel: jel:C92, jel: jel:C91
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
