
In this article, we describe the estimation of linear regression models with uncertainty about the choice of the explanatory variables. We introduce the Stata commands bma and wals, which implement, respectively, the exact Bayesian model-averaging estimator and the weighted-average least-squares estimator developed by Magnus, Powell, and Prüfer (2010, Journal of Econometrics 154: 139–153). Unlike standard pretest estimators that are based on some preliminary diagnostic test, these model-averaging estimators provide a coherent way of making inference on the regression parameters of interest by taking into account the uncertainty due to both the estimation and the model selection steps. Special emphasis is given to several practical issues that users are likely to face in applied work: equivariance to certain transformations of the explanatory variables, stability, accuracy, computing speed, and out-of-memory problems. Performances of our bma and wals commands are illustrated using simulated data and empirical applications from the literature on model-averaging estimation.
Exact bayesian model averaging, Wals, Exact computation, Bayesian analysis, Bma, Model uncertainty; Model averaging; Bayesian analysis; Exact computation, Model uncertainty, Weighted-average least squares, Model uncertainty;Model averaging;Bayesian analysis;Exact computation, st0239, Model averaging, jel: jel:C52, jel: jel:C51, jel: jel:C11
Exact bayesian model averaging, Wals, Exact computation, Bayesian analysis, Bma, Model uncertainty; Model averaging; Bayesian analysis; Exact computation, Model uncertainty, Weighted-average least squares, Model uncertainty;Model averaging;Bayesian analysis;Exact computation, st0239, Model averaging, jel: jel:C52, jel: jel:C51, jel: jel:C11
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 98 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
