
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1765646
handle: 10419/46103
We develop entrepreneurship and institutional theory to explain variation in different types of entrepreneurship across individuals and institutional contexts. Our framework generates hypotheses about the negative impact of higher levels of corruption, weaker property rights and especially intellectual property rights, and a larger state on entrepreneurs who plan to grow faster. We test these hypotheses using the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor surveys in 55 countries for 2001-2006, applying a multilevel estimation framework. We confirm our main hypotheses but we find no significant impact from intellectual property rights.
Unternehmer, entrepreneurship, institutions, corruption, property rights, government, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, L26, Korruption, Welt, corruption, J24, entrepreneurship, institutions, Immaterialgüterrechte, P11, ddc:330, Institutionelle Infrastruktur, Corruption; Entrepreneurship; Global Entrepreneurship Monitor; Government; Institutions; Property Rights, government, Unternehmensgründung, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, D84, D23, property rights, jel: jel:D84, jel: jel:D23, jel: jel:J24, jel: jel:L26, jel: jel:P11
Unternehmer, entrepreneurship, institutions, corruption, property rights, government, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, L26, Korruption, Welt, corruption, J24, entrepreneurship, institutions, Immaterialgüterrechte, P11, ddc:330, Institutionelle Infrastruktur, Corruption; Entrepreneurship; Global Entrepreneurship Monitor; Government; Institutions; Property Rights, government, Unternehmensgründung, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, D84, D23, property rights, jel: jel:D84, jel: jel:D23, jel: jel:J24, jel: jel:L26, jel: jel:P11
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
