Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Using Different Budgeting Procedures to Coordinate Principal-Agent Relationships

Authors: Christian Hofmann;

Using Different Budgeting Procedures to Coordinate Principal-Agent Relationships

Abstract

Principal-Agent models consider vertical coordination problems within a firm, when there is a trade-off between efficient risk-sharing and efficient incentives to work. One reason of the agency problem is the activity set available to the agent and the principal's inability to costlessly observe the agent's action choice. Budgeting systems reduce the agent's activity set, therefore reducing the agency problem. When applying a budgeting system e.g. in an overhead cost department, the principal determines the activity set which is available to the agent. Then, the principal might either specify several activities which account for known environmental conditions. Because of the different activities we address this alternative as a flexible budget. There, the agent's task is to choose one of the given activities. Alternatively, the principal might specify fewer activities that are available to the agent, i.e. she reduces the diversity of the agent's reactions to environmental conditions. Then, a rigid budget results. We analyze a moral hazard problem resulting from a combined hidden action and hidden information situation. The agency problem is formulated with the assumptions of the LEN-model. For several budgeting procedures we determine second best reward schedules, activity sets and levels, and show the conditions, where flexible or rigid budgeting systems are likewise to be applied to.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!