
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1498454
Cap-and-trade systems are dominating worldwide the policy-makers' choices about the design of climate policies. This is an issue for several of economists, who are arguing that the structure of the costs and damages of climate change gives a strong presumption to price-type approaches. Those who advocate optimality at any cost are looking at the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen as an opportunity to move towards a price-oriented global climate policy. However, according to the new mainstream uncertainty analysis, a quantitative standard is preferable to avoid "dangerous" climate change. Moreover a price-type approach may be detrimental to a large-scale development of renewable energy. If decisions makers wish to follow the Precautionary Principle and want to guide society to a more sustainable world, then they should stick to the existing quantity-oriented policy framework and work hard to find a compromise in order to expand the global cooperation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
