Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Capitalization versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Current Investments in PP&E versus R&D

Authors: S.P. Kothari; Ted E. Laguerre; Andrew J. Leone;

Capitalization versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Current Investments in PP&E versus R&D

Abstract

Accounting standards reflect a trade-off between relevance and reliability. This trade-off is intensely debated in the context of the accounting standard for R&D costs. However, almost all of the empirical research focuses only on the relevance of accounting disclosures about R&D costs. Little systematic evidence exists on the reliability of future benefits from R&D outlays. We propose and implement a new method to estimate the relation between investments in R&D and the uncertainty of future benefits from those investments. The empirical analysis compares the relative contributions of current investments in R&D and PP&E to future earnings variability using a sample of more than 50,000 firm-year observations. Evidence is strongly consistent with the hypothesis that R&D investments generate future benefits that are far more uncertain than benefits from investments in PP&E. Our results, together with the evidence on value relevance of R&D from previous research, should be helpful in the current discussion on accounting for R&D.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    113
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
113
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!