
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.146211
Accounting standards reflect a trade-off between relevance and reliability. This trade-off is intensely debated in the context of the accounting standard for R&D costs. However, almost all of the empirical research focuses only on the relevance of accounting disclosures about R&D costs. Little systematic evidence exists on the reliability of future benefits from R&D outlays. We propose and implement a new method to estimate the relation between investments in R&D and the uncertainty of future benefits from those investments. The empirical analysis compares the relative contributions of current investments in R&D and PP&E to future earnings variability using a sample of more than 50,000 firm-year observations. Evidence is strongly consistent with the hypothesis that R&D investments generate future benefits that are far more uncertain than benefits from investments in PP&E. Our results, together with the evidence on value relevance of R&D from previous research, should be helpful in the current discussion on accounting for R&D.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 113 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
