
This contribution examines various aspects of "openness" in research, and seeks to gauge the degree to which contemporary "e-science" practices are congruent with "open science." Norms and practices of openness are held to have been vital for the work of modern scientific communities, but concerns about the growth of stronger technical and institutional restraints on access to research tools, data and information recently have attracted notice - in part because of their implications for the effective utilization of advanced digital infrastructures and information technologies in research collaborations. Our discussion clarifies the conceptual differences between e-science and open science, and reports findings from a preliminary look at practices in U.K. e-science projects. Both parts serve to underscore the point that it is unwarranted to presume that the development of e-science necessarily promotes global open science collaboration. As there is evident need for further empirical research to establish where, when, and to what extent "openness" and "e-ness" in scientific and engineering research may be expected to advance hand-in-hand, we outline a framework within which such a program of studies might be undertaken.
e-Science, Open Science, Engineering Reserach, e-science projects' experiences, [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, E-DiaMoND, Open science, practice of research, [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, 004, organization research, jel: jel:I23
e-Science, Open Science, Engineering Reserach, e-science projects' experiences, [SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, E-DiaMoND, Open science, practice of research, [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, 004, organization research, jel: jel:I23
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
