
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.123455
handle: 10419/154903
This paper analyzes the institutional arrangements governing the international transfer of input-embodied new technologies in agriculture. While developed countries characteristically allow "multiple channel" private and public technological transfer, developing countries often force technology transfer through a "single channel" controlled by government agencies, with an emphasis on official performance tests. On the basis of case studies, it is shown that allowing private technology transfer and refocusing input regulations on externalities can lead to significant productivity and income gains in developing countries.
Deregulierung, O33, Handelsliberalisierung, ddc:330, F14, Agriculture, Agrartechnik, Türkei, Technologietransfer, Technological transfer, Input trade liberalization, Institutionalismus, Entwicklungsländer, Bangladesch, Theorie
Deregulierung, O33, Handelsliberalisierung, ddc:330, F14, Agriculture, Agrartechnik, Türkei, Technologietransfer, Technological transfer, Input trade liberalization, Institutionalismus, Entwicklungsländer, Bangladesch, Theorie
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
