
AbstractThis paper investigates the long‐run economic relationship between health care expenditure and income in the US at a State level. Using a panel of 49 US States over the period 1980–2004, we study the non‐stationarity and co‐integration between health spending and income, ultimately measuring income elasticity of health care. The tests we adopt allow us to explicitly control for cross‐section dependence and unobserved heterogeneity. Specifically, in our regression equations we assume that the error has a multifactor structure, which may capture global shocks and local spill overs in health expenditure. Our results suggest that health care is a necessity rather than a luxury, with an elasticity much smaller than that estimated in other US studies. Further, we detect significant spatial concentration in US health spending. Our broad perspective of cross‐section dependence as well as the methods used to capture it give new insights on the debate over the relationship between health spending and income. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Health expenditure; income elasticity; cross section dependence; panels, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., United States, cross section; dependence; health expenditure; income elasticity; panels; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.; Cross-Sectional Studies; Health Expenditures; Humans; Income; Models, Econometric; Regression Analysis; United States, Cross-Sectional Studies, Income, Humans, Regression Analysis, Health Expenditures, Models, Econometric, jel: jel:C31, jel: jel:H51, jel: jel:C33
Health expenditure; income elasticity; cross section dependence; panels, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., United States, cross section; dependence; health expenditure; income elasticity; panels; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.; Cross-Sectional Studies; Health Expenditures; Humans; Income; Models, Econometric; Regression Analysis; United States, Cross-Sectional Studies, Income, Humans, Regression Analysis, Health Expenditures, Models, Econometric, jel: jel:C31, jel: jel:H51, jel: jel:C33
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 111 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
