<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 10419/21303
Labor turnover creates longer term career concerns incentives that motivate employees in addition to the short term monetary incentives provided by the current employer. We analyze how these incentives interact and derive implications for the design of incentive contracts and organizational choice. The main insights stem from a trade-off between 'good monetary incentives' and 'good reputational incentives'. We show that the principal optimally designs contracts to create ambiguity about agents' abilities. This may make it optimal to contract on relative performance measures, even though the extant rationales for such schemes are absent. Linking the structure of contracts to organizational design, we show that it can be optimal for the principal to adopt an opaque organization where performance is not verifiable, despite the constraints that this imposes on contracts.
[SHS.GESTION.FIN] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration/domain_shs.gestion.fin, employers, L14, 330, ddc:330, J33, asymmetric learning, Faculty of History and Social Science\Economics, personnel management, reputation, labor turnover, Transparency, relative performance contracts, Asymmetric learning, D82, Relative performance contracts, Reputation, Asymmetric learning, Relative performance contracts, Transparency, Reputation, job satisfaction
[SHS.GESTION.FIN] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration/domain_shs.gestion.fin, employers, L14, 330, ddc:330, J33, asymmetric learning, Faculty of History and Social Science\Economics, personnel management, reputation, labor turnover, Transparency, relative performance contracts, Asymmetric learning, D82, Relative performance contracts, Reputation, Asymmetric learning, Relative performance contracts, Transparency, Reputation, job satisfaction
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |