
Microsprinklers allow precise control of irrigation water applications and offer the potential for higher efficiency of water and fertilizer use compared with flood irrigation. A field experiment was conducted during 1999–2002 in central Arizona (AZ) to evaluate effects of various N rates and fertigation frequencies on fruit yield and quality, leaf N concentration, and residual soil N of ‘Newhall’ navel oranges ( Citrus sinensis ) on ‘Carrizo’ citrange ( Porcirus trifoliata x Citrus sinensis ) rootstock (planted in 1997) grown in a Gilman (coarse‐loamy, mixed, superactive, calcareous, hyperthermic Typic Torrifluvents) fine sandy loam. The experiment included nonfertilized control plots and factorial combinations of three fertigation frequencies (27, 9, and 3 applications annually) and three N rates (68, 136, and 204 g N tree −1 yr −1 ). Maximum yields occurred at N rates of 105 to 153 g N tree −1 yr −1 for the fourth to the sixth growing seasons. The yield‐maximizing N rates were equivalent to 17 to 34% of currently recommended N rates for citrus grown in AZ. Fruit and juice quality did not show significant response to N rate or fertigation frequency. Leaf N concentrations at yield‐maximizing N rates were above the critical leaf tissue N range of 25 to 27 mg g −1 , indicating that this range may be too low for these ‘Newhall’ navel orange trees. During all three seasons, higher residual soil NO 3 concentrations resulted from the highest N rate. Our results suggest that optimum N rates for microsprinkler‐irrigated ‘Newhall’ navel oranges in AZ are lower than currently recommended N rates.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
