Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Soil Science Society...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Soil Microbial Fingerprints, Carbon, and Nitrogen in a Mojave Desert Creosote‐Bush Ecosystem

Authors: Stephanie A. Ewing; Randal J. Southard; Jennifer L. Macalady; Anthony S. Hartshorn; Mara J. Johnson;

Soil Microbial Fingerprints, Carbon, and Nitrogen in a Mojave Desert Creosote‐Bush Ecosystem

Abstract

Creosote‐bush [ Larrea tridentata (Sessé & Moc. ex DC.) Coville] shrubs in California's Mojave Desert support well‐developed soil resource islands, where individual shrubs define areas of elevated soil nutrients, water‐holding capacity, and microbial activity. To better understand the spatial variability of microbial communities and potential impacts on nutrient cycling in shrub ecosystems, we examined microbial communities using polar lipid fatty acids (PLFA) and several soil properties including δ 15 N, DNA, C and N contents under mature shrubs and as a function of horizontal distance (0–3 m) away from the base of the shrubs. Shrub‐base soils (0 m) contained more C and N, were slightly more acidic, and supported significantly larger microbial populations than soils between shrubs. The PLFA fingerprints also suggested that microbial communities, particularly at the shrub base, had a different composition than soils between shrubs, including a higher proportion of actinomycetes containing the biomarker 10me17:0. Soil respiration was generally highest at 0 m, corresponding with larger microbial biomass and larger C and N pools, but was highly variable, probably due to contributions from grasses and forbs. Average δ 15 N values resembled plant material at the shrub base (4‰) and were significantly isotopically enriched away from the shrubs (7‰), suggesting that fractionating losses of soil N occurred between shrubs. The elevated nutrient status of resource islands supported soil microbial communities that were larger, were different in character, respired more actively, and cycled N more tightly than those found in open spaces between shrubs. These open spaces “leak” isotopically light N from the soil.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!