Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Crop Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Crop Science
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Crop Science
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Crop Science
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Stalk Strength in Four Maize Populations

Authors: Sherry A. Flint-Garcia; Chaba Jampatong; Larry L. Darrah; Michael D. McMullen;

Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Stalk Strength in Four Maize Populations

Abstract

Stalk lodging in maize (Zea mays L.) causes yield losses estimated to range from 5 to 20% annually worldwide. Selection for rind penetrometer resistance (RPR) has proven useful in enhancing germplasm for stalk strength, and therefore improving stalk lodging resistance. We conducted quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for RPR in four F2:3 populations. The populations were constructed by means of combinations of MoSCSSS‐High (selection for high RPR), MoSCSSS‐Low (selection for low RPR), MoSQB‐Low (selection for low stalk crushing strength), inbred line Mo47, and inbred line B73. Individuals in each population were genotyped for simple sequence repeat (SSR) or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers, and data were collected for RPR over multiple locations and replications. Means combined over environments were used as trait data for composite interval mapping by QTL Cartographer. Eight, 10, eight, and nine single‐effect QTL and four, two, zero, and five epistatic interactions were detected for RPR in the four populations. Multilocus models, including the single‐effect QTL and epistatic interactions, accounted for 33.4, 44.7, 48.4, and 58.7% of the total phenotypic variation. These data clearly indicate the complex nature of stalk strength. One chromosomal region contained a QTL from all four populations, while two QTL were in common among three of the four populations and five QTL were in common between two populations. Candidate genes that overlap QTL confidence intervals include those involved in lignin synthesis, the phenylpropanoid pathway, and the timing of vegetative phase change.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    143
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
143
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze