Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Crop Forage & Turfgr...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Integrated Pest Management of Nematodes on Bermudagrass Turf

Authors: Sudarshan K. Aryal; William T. Crow; Robert McSorley; Robin M. Giblin‐Davis; Kevin E. Kenworthy;

Integrated Pest Management of Nematodes on Bermudagrass Turf

Abstract

Use of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) cultivars resistant/tolerant to plant‐parasitic nematodes is an important component of integrated pest management (IPM) for sustainable turf nematode management in sandy coastal soils of the southeastern United States. A multiyear field experiment evaluated five bermudagrass genotypes (‘Tifway’, standard susceptible; two commercial cultivars, ‘TifSport’ and ‘Celebration’; and two experimental germplasm, BA132 and PI 291590, that were identified as tolerant to sting nematode [Belonolaimus longicaudatus]) and four different nematicide regimes (untreated control, Curfew Soil Fumigant [1,3‐dichloropropene], monitoring‐based IPM [action threshold nematicide program], and calendar‐based IPM [nematicide rotation]). Nematode samples were collected at 3‐month intervals from February 2012 to November 2014. No significant differences among the genotypes with regard to population density of sting nematode were documented, but there were differences among genotypes with regard to some of the other plant‐parasitic nematodes, particularly spiral (Helicotylenchus paxilli) and ring (Mesocriconema ornatum) nematodes. There were significant nematicide regime responses on nematode population level after August 2013. A calendar‐based IPM program rotating Nortica (Bacillus firmus strain I‐1582), Multiguard Protect (furfural), MustGrow Invest (Brassica juncea), and Avid (abamectin) significantly reduced the nematode population density compared with a monitoring‐based IPM program and the standard soil fumigant nematicide Curfew. In the untreated control, nematode population densities were significantly higher than in the other treatments. Celebration and PI 291590 bermudagrass genotypes had better percent green cover throughout the study.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!