Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Agronomy Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Agronomy Journal
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Response of Corn and Redroot Pigweed to Nitrogen Fertilizer in Different Irrigation Regimes

Authors: Majid Gholamhoseini; Majid AghaAlikhani; Seyed Ali Mohammad Modarres Sanavy; Seyed Majid Mirlatifi; Hamed Zakikhani;

Response of Corn and Redroot Pigweed to Nitrogen Fertilizer in Different Irrigation Regimes

Abstract

The effect of irrigation regimes and N rates on corn (Zea mays L.) yield and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) growth in sandy soils is not completely understood. Therefore, field experiments were conducted in a semiarid region of Iran in 2010 and 2011 to determine the influence of N rates and irrigation regimes on corn and redroot pigweed leaf area index (LAI), dry matter and grain yield, N uptake, irrigation water productivity (IWP) and N leaching loss. The experiment was conducted using a randomized complete‐block design with a split‐factorial arrangement of treatments in four replicates. The main plots were subjected to either a low (L) or a full (F) irrigation regime. The subplots were arranged in a factorial scheme with four N rates (0, 150, 300, and 450 kg N ha−1) and two levels of redroot pigweed interference with corn (weed free, CW0; and weedy, CW1). The results indicated that the more N was applied, the higher were corn grain yield losses in both irrigation regimes due to weed interference. The difference in corn grain yield between CW0F and CW1F treatments was 400 and 1800 kg ha−1 at N0 and N450 levels, respectively. In contrast, the difference between CW0L and CW1L reached 300 and 800 kg grain ha−1 at N0 and N450 levels, respectively. Based on the information gained in this study, we do not recommend increasing inputs (water and N), especially in sandy soils, to diminish the redroot pigweed/corn competition.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!