Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Agronomy Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Agronomy Journal
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Comparison of Drought Probability Assessments Based on Atmospheric Water Deficit and Soil Water Deficit

Authors: Guilherme M. Torres; Romulo P. Lollato; Tyson E. Ochsner;

Comparison of Drought Probability Assessments Based on Atmospheric Water Deficit and Soil Water Deficit

Abstract

Methods that estimate the probability of agricultural drought using atmospheric data can be widely applied but have not been compared with actual drought occurrence indicated by soil moisture measurements. Our objectives were to develop a drought probability assessment method using long‐term measurements of soil water deficits (SWDs) and to compare the resulting probabilities with those of an existing method based on atmospheric water deficits (AWDs). Fifteen years of daily precipitation, air temperature, and soil moisture measurements for eight locations across Oklahoma were used to calculate the probability (P) of water deficits sufficient to cause plant water stress for each day of the growing season. For the SWD method, the drought threshold was set at 50% depletion of the soil’s total available water capacity. For the AWD method, the threshold was a 7‐d cumulative AWD of 50 mm. Values of AWD were similar to calculated SWD for the 0‐ to 40‐cm soil layer in the spring; however, AWD values seldom reached the drought threshold. Thus, drought P values calculated by the AWD method were unreasonably low and consistently lower than P estimated by the SWD method. The AWD method showed greater agreement with the SWD method when 37 mm was used as the AWD threshold or when the original 50‐mm threshold was applied for a 15‐d cumulative AWD. The new SWD method gave plausible and consistent results when applied to both the 0‐ to 40‐ and 0‐ to 80‐cm soil layers and should be utilized when long‐term soil moisture data are available.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    63
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
63
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!