A Critique of Adaptive Routing

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Report , Other literature type 18 Jun 1992 United States Publisher:Defense Technical Information Center

Authors: Pertel, Michael J.;

doi: 10.21236/ada448703 , 10.7907/z9r78ccz

A Critique of Adaptive Routing

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

© 1992 California Institute of Technology. June 18, 1992. The research described in this report was sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Support was provided by a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship. I gratefully acknowledge the direction and assistance of my advisor, Dr. C.L. Seitz.

This report refutes claims that adaptive routing performs better than dimension-order routing. Simulation results are presented that show dimension-order routing achieves both higher throughput and lower latency than adaptive routing. Specious claims for the advantages of adaptive routing are critiqued.

Submitted - postscript.pdf Submitted - postscript.ps

Country

United States

Related Organizations

California Institute of Technology
United States

Keywords

551

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	9
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average