
doi: 10.21236/ada050523
Abstract : The goals of this study project were: to become familiar with the mechanisms of the IR/D technical evaluation process as it is intended to work; to determine how the process works in practice; and to identify areas of improvement. This report presents the results of an analysis and evaluation of the IR/D technical evaluation process. DOD and military department documents and regulations were examined to determine implementation procedures. Interviews with government and industry IR/D managers are summarized and evaluated. The value of IR/D is presented along with discussion of documentation from public law, ASPR and DOD policy guidance which stipulates requirements for conducting IR/D evaluations. Conclusions and recommendations are presented based upon an analysis of the information gained from documentation and interviews.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
