Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Optimum Worldwide Safety Management for MODUs: Using Our Experiences Toward Adaptation of the ISM Code as an International Standard for the Offshore Drilling Industry

Authors: Paul Tranter; Michel Legrand; Capella Festa; Andy Grieve;

Optimum Worldwide Safety Management for MODUs: Using Our Experiences Toward Adaptation of the ISM Code as an International Standard for the Offshore Drilling Industry

Abstract

Abstract Our industry now faces proliferating requests for demonstrations of safe and pollution free operations from regulators and clients worldwide. At times this can be burdensome and confusing. Sedco Forex and IADC have two useful mutual experiences which may assist in tackling this problem. One is the UK safety case regime, the other is the International Maritime Organisation (IMO). We note with interest the development of the IMO International Safety Management Code. It seemed appropriate to use these experiences to work together for a trial assimilation of the ISM Code for MODUs and drilling operations. We give an overview, then consider the tasks for working in the IMO with flag States, Classification Societies, the E & P Forum and with different types of coastal state regulators (inactive, prescriptive, and goal-setting). This paper, the result of our initial investigation, concludes that the ISM Code could provide one worldwide standard for safety management systems for MODUs. We fear further confusion if industry does not act to develop such a standard. We therefore seek to promote discussion toward a drilling industry consensus for action to achieve this aim. Introduction The international focus on safety in the offshore industry is unprecedented and we now face a proliferation of requirements for safety management systems from individual coastal states and from major oil company clients and regulators. These requirements have resulted in a number of responses from drilling contractors. Though the general objectives of each party are the same, the modus operandi, or means to the stated end, of conducting safe and continuously improving operations can differ substantially, often causing confusion. For the offshore drilling contractor who moves units between unique sovereign states and undertakes operations for numerous clients, compliance with differing methodologies and differing demands of demonstration can detract from meeting general objectives of safer operations by reduction of risk. What we are left with is, in effect, barriers to international trade promulgated by the coastal state, and abetted by the oil companies whose task is to exploit their mineral resources under the coastal state's system of laws. These barriers could be overcome by cooperation to adopt common standards. However, this is difficult as coastal states are reluctant to harmonize their requirements, apparently due to confrontational aspects of comparing their regulatory regimes. However, there is one way forward. MODUs belong to the world's shipping fleet and Operate under the requirements of a flag State administration who adopt and act according to codes, standards and conventions of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), often with the assistance of the Classification Societies. Over recent years the IMO has recognized that the shipping industry must continue to take firm steps to improve standards and formalize its approach to safety on an international basis. P. 133^

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!