Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Distributed-Flux Burners Improve Life of Firetubes and Process Throughput in Heater Treaters

Authors: David Bartz; Michael Silberstein; James Gotterba;

Distributed-Flux Burners Improve Life of Firetubes and Process Throughput in Heater Treaters

Abstract

Abstract Polymer agents are being used to increase the yield of oil-sand reservoirs. While these polymers are effective in increasing yield, they present problems in heater treaters used for oil/water separation. In particular, the heavy oil and polymer emulsion can coat the outer surface of heater treater firetubes, creating an insulating layer that causes high wall temperatures of the firetube. This can lead to early failure of the firetube, causing costly shutdowns and repair. The unique design of the distributed-flux burner solves this problem by providing uniform heat distribution over a greater area of the firetube compared to conventional burner technology. The burner utilizes premixed surface-stabilized combustion on a porous ceramic cylindrical surface. Heat release of the burner is kept constant along the entire burner surface. The burner is located in the center of the firetube along the tube axis, providing uniform heat distribution to the wall. This design significantly reduces the peak heat flux and film temperatures around the firetube found with conventional burners, which in turn reduces harmful thermal degradation of the firetube and coking of the oil mixture. Thermal analysis shows that for the same total energy input, the distributed-flux burner provides a 33% reduction in peak heat flux to the firetube wall compared to a conventional burner. The distributed-flux burner technology has been successfully used in heater treaters in California and in asphalt heating tanks in Canada. This paper will present design data from a recent installation of the distributed-flux burner in a heater treater for a Canadian oilfield using polymer injection that had previously suffered frequent firetube failures.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!